Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Getting Your Genius in Print
Let’s talk about publishing. That’s why you’re here, right? I mean, the blog’s titled “Publishing: Uncovered” so you must be wishing to uncover the ins and outs of publishing (…or you’re just a vociferous reader of blogs, which is okay too). That being the case, today’s topic will be on publishing your work. Now, there are many ways to get published, from large-run book publishing (which includes those on the New York Times Bestseller list and the like) to small-run book publishing (which includes books for niche markets or those with low-marketability: which of course doesn’t mean that they’re bad, just that the public-at-large isn’t ready for it), self-publishing (which the lovely Lyla P. has recently written on), and journal publishing (which publishes short fiction, poetry, short nonfiction, and essays in various zines, literary journals, and the like). For today’s post, I’ll be focusing upon journal publishing, and how to get your work into print.
Monday, September 20, 2010
New publisher offers BOTH traditional and indie publishing
It used to be publishers were exclusively traditional or indie-friendly.
1. Traditional: These publishers will typically only accept submissions from literary agents. The smaller ones will sometimes let you send your manuscript, yourself. But either way, if they don't like your work, they don't publish it, and you move on. If they do want to publish it, you may or may not get an advance, and your books will appear in bookstores nationwide. These are your Random Houses, your Harper Perennials, and your Little, Brown & Cos.
2. Indie-friendly (whether "vanity" or POD): they print what you send them and you pay to have the book distributed through online bookstores. (There's a little more to it than that, but the point is, there's no acceptance necessary from a publisher to use any of the self-publishing methods. No gate-keeper is stopping you from releasing your book to the virtual shelves.) These are your Lulus, your Xlibrises, your iUniverses, and your AuthorHouses.
Traditional publishers: Pretty books. Quality books. Professional books. Edited books. Good distribution.
Indie-friendly "vanity" or POD publishers: Not really edited (you can opt to pay for editing "services," but ... well ... ). So-so to really bad paper quality and flimsy, curling covers. Little to no bookstore distribution.
It used to be authors had to make a choice, but one new company, Foghorn Publishers, offers both models. (Visitors to the under-construction website will notice a predominance of self-help, Christian, and African-American history books. That's how Foghorn began, and it's how they plan to continue, but they've also recently made the exciting decision to expand and will soon feature an even wider selection of categories.)
Traditional: Foghorn accepts submissions from both agented and un-agented authors in the categories of fiction (mystery, sci-fi/fantasy, and literary only, and preferably with a unique - but still marketable - quality), creative nonfiction, and natural health and wellness. While relatively new, Foghorn has established a reputation with booksellers across the country and distributes nationwide. Those who have their work selected for traditional publication receive a standard publishing contract.
Indie-friendly: Independencia Press, an imprint of Foghorn Publishers, offers its professional services to those who prefer to have more control over the creation and distribution of their material. The same skilled and experienced editors (professional writers and graduate degree holders in English, writing, and/or literature) and innovative graphic designers who create the traditionally published books for Foghorn are paid to proofread, edit, and design those submitted by indie authors, which means the aesthetic quality of the independently released book will be indistinguishable from those published traditionally. Note: the printing press used by Independencia is the same one used by HarperCollins, Random House, Hachette, Penguin, and Simon & Schuster.
So, if you're an author who feels like a) you've exhausted all of your options in the traditional publishing world, or b) you're going to have to choose the least of all self-publishing-company evils, there's another option.
- Lyla P.
1. Traditional: These publishers will typically only accept submissions from literary agents. The smaller ones will sometimes let you send your manuscript, yourself. But either way, if they don't like your work, they don't publish it, and you move on. If they do want to publish it, you may or may not get an advance, and your books will appear in bookstores nationwide. These are your Random Houses, your Harper Perennials, and your Little, Brown & Cos.
2. Indie-friendly (whether "vanity" or POD): they print what you send them and you pay to have the book distributed through online bookstores. (There's a little more to it than that, but the point is, there's no acceptance necessary from a publisher to use any of the self-publishing methods. No gate-keeper is stopping you from releasing your book to the virtual shelves.) These are your Lulus, your Xlibrises, your iUniverses, and your AuthorHouses.
Traditional publishers: Pretty books. Quality books. Professional books. Edited books. Good distribution.
Indie-friendly "vanity" or POD publishers: Not really edited (you can opt to pay for editing "services," but ... well ... ). So-so to really bad paper quality and flimsy, curling covers. Little to no bookstore distribution.
It used to be authors had to make a choice, but one new company, Foghorn Publishers, offers both models. (Visitors to the under-construction website will notice a predominance of self-help, Christian, and African-American history books. That's how Foghorn began, and it's how they plan to continue, but they've also recently made the exciting decision to expand and will soon feature an even wider selection of categories.)
Traditional: Foghorn accepts submissions from both agented and un-agented authors in the categories of fiction (mystery, sci-fi/fantasy, and literary only, and preferably with a unique - but still marketable - quality), creative nonfiction, and natural health and wellness. While relatively new, Foghorn has established a reputation with booksellers across the country and distributes nationwide. Those who have their work selected for traditional publication receive a standard publishing contract.
Indie-friendly: Independencia Press, an imprint of Foghorn Publishers, offers its professional services to those who prefer to have more control over the creation and distribution of their material. The same skilled and experienced editors (professional writers and graduate degree holders in English, writing, and/or literature) and innovative graphic designers who create the traditionally published books for Foghorn are paid to proofread, edit, and design those submitted by indie authors, which means the aesthetic quality of the independently released book will be indistinguishable from those published traditionally. Note: the printing press used by Independencia is the same one used by HarperCollins, Random House, Hachette, Penguin, and Simon & Schuster.
So, if you're an author who feels like a) you've exhausted all of your options in the traditional publishing world, or b) you're going to have to choose the least of all self-publishing-company evils, there's another option.
- Lyla P.
Thursday, September 9, 2010
Nobody cares what your book cover looks like.
Keep telling yourself that as you, self-published (or "indie") author, create your title in Comic Sans with drop-shadows, inner glow, and some contouring to make it "pop," plopping it dead center on a free stock-photo image you found online.
"Ew," they'll say. "That book looks self-published."
"Ew," they'll say. "That book looks self-published."
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Book Blurbs: Worth the trouble?
Every book has a back cover, which means something must be written on that back cover. What you'll usually find is a brief synopsis and some nice blurbs (unless you're Chuck Palahniuk, in which case, who needs a synopsis?), but how much do those blurbs mean? Should you take the time to write authors or reviewers you respect to ask them to blurb your book? (Or should you just ask anyone who'll say yes, and who cares who they are to you as long as someone else knows them?)
Stephen J. Dubner writes in his 2007 New York Times piece "How Much do Book Blurbs Matter?" that he used to give some credence to blurbs until, one day, he received a letter in the mail "along with the manuscript for a business book by two authors I don’t know. The letter was written by the book’s editor, another person I don’t know. Here’s the key paragraph:
Stephen J. Dubner writes in his 2007 New York Times piece "How Much do Book Blurbs Matter?" that he used to give some credence to blurbs until, one day, he received a letter in the mail "along with the manuscript for a business book by two authors I don’t know. The letter was written by the book’s editor, another person I don’t know. Here’s the key paragraph:
If you find [redacted] and [redacted]’s ideas as compelling and inspiring as we do, a quote from you that we could print on the jacket would make a world of difference. I would be happy to help craft a quote if you prefer. My contact info is below."Dubner writes, "I’ve come to believe [blurbs] really don’t matter at all, since most readers see blurbs as having about the same level of integrity as a used-car salesman’s personal promise that the car you’re about to buy is A-OK. But that might be an insult to used-car salesmen."
Monday, August 30, 2010
Getting Some Distance
You have just finished your brilliant work—a piece that combines the wit of The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman with the social commentary of Midnight’s Children and the style of Finnegan’s Wake—and you are soaring in the clouds. Your long-awaited goal as finally arrived and you are ready to pack your baby off to the nearest publisher and wait for the money and Pulitzers to roll in. But, before you do, there are some things you need to consider that, if they catch you unawares, could cause you to stumble and fall from your great heights in angsty, writerly frustration (Be honest, you’re a writer and thus have a slight tendency towards the melodramatic).
Friday, August 27, 2010
Write what you know. And don't.
"Write what you know" generates a lot of discussion, some arguments, and even some anger.
WRITER 1: What do you mean, "Write what you know"? If I wrote what I knew, I'd write about sunken couches and empty cashew tins.
WRITER 2: Yes. Do that. Because you have felt the couch. You have eaten the cashews. You know the taste of the salt on your fingers, the corduroy rub of the flattened cushion under your buttocks. That is real. That is pain. Write it. Write!
WRITER 1: I'd rather use my imagination and write what I don't know, thank you very much. I want to write about angels.
WRITER 2: Are you an angel?
WRITER 1: No. I mean, I'm not not an angel. Like, I'm not a bad person, or anything, but I'm not--
WRITER 2: How can you write about angels if you don't know what it's like to be an angel?
This isn't what "Write what you know" means.
WRITER 1: What do you mean, "Write what you know"? If I wrote what I knew, I'd write about sunken couches and empty cashew tins.
WRITER 2: Yes. Do that. Because you have felt the couch. You have eaten the cashews. You know the taste of the salt on your fingers, the corduroy rub of the flattened cushion under your buttocks. That is real. That is pain. Write it. Write!
WRITER 1: I'd rather use my imagination and write what I don't know, thank you very much. I want to write about angels.
WRITER 2: Are you an angel?
WRITER 1: No. I mean, I'm not not an angel. Like, I'm not a bad person, or anything, but I'm not--
WRITER 2: How can you write about angels if you don't know what it's like to be an angel?
This isn't what "Write what you know" means.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Are You Being Followed?: Self-Promotion in the Web 2.0 Age
Self-promotion of your new book has begun, you’ve printed advertisements, told your friends so much about your book they’ll buy it just to shut you up, and you’ve set up a blog, a Twitter account, a Facebook page, you’ve even set up a MySpace page and a Friendster account, you name it, you’ve set it up on the tech front. But, now that you have all of these accounts opened, activated, and ready, you’re in sore need of something to fill your endless gigabytes of message board. I mean, you can’t just keep spamming “LOOK FOR MY BOOK ‘FLIGHT OF THE SALAMANDER’ AUGUST 24, 2011” for an entire year. This forward attempt may have worked with your friends and family, but the internet is a different beast altogether, one who is not above leaving a nasty comment on your wall and cutting off all further contact.
So, what do you do? Well, that’s a big question and requires different answers tailored to the specific social networking formats you’re using. Today’s post will center on the newest social networking site to hit the net; you’ve guessed it: Twitter.
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Be a tortured artist, but don't be a spoiled writer.
You’ve written the book, and it’s good. It’s even published—whether by you or by a traditional publisher—and now you want people to read it.
But you don’t really want to have to think about how to GET them to read it, because you’re not a publicist or a marketer—you’re a writer. You spend minutes, many of them, searching for the perfect word (Work? no…Toil? nooope…Labor? yes! labor!). You craft your sentences with purpose, intentionally choosing words with a certain number of syllables (and maybe some assonance, too), and you place your commas (or refrain from placing them at all) very deliberately, all of it working together to draw the reader into the scene or the narrator’s mind and mood. You’ll even spend days—days!—pondering a character’s name—Paulo? Chadwick III? Bob?—until you find the perfect fit for your protagonist’s second cousin. How could you, an artist, be asked to—*choke*—sell your own books?
Monday, August 16, 2010
The Secrets of Self-Marketing; or, You're Published, Now What?
So, you’ve managed to write your book, snagged a publisher, and are now wondering what you can do to help your book sell once it finishes its run through the publishing process. Well, it looks like you’re not the only one. Recently, the Huffington Post posted an article by publicist and marketing expert Arielle Ford concerning the various factors that motivate someone to buy one book over another. You can find the full article here. While short, it contains some useful information regarding what you yourself can do to drum up book sales both before and after your book hits the shelves. The article can be boiled down into three main ways in which you can work up your audience into a buying frenzy for your book.
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Blogger's Block
Today I will be writing about that Sauron to your creativity’s Frodo, that Magneto to your intellect’s Professor X, and that Jar Jar Binks to your inner fanboy’s self-respect. Today, I will be writing about writer’s block.
The irony of writing about writer’s block does not go unnoticed by me, your heroic blogger. I came up with this topic following a desperate bout with this ultimate evil that left me with a fragment of an idea and a near-concussion after applying my forehead to the desk multiple times with increasing force. Now, I wouldn’t suggest such a response to writer’s block if one can help it. If not professionally done, the Head-Desk Method will only result in blunt trauma, a trip to the hospital, and possibly a broken keyboard. So, you may be asking, how do the non-“professionals” deal with this juggernaut if we don’t wish to fork over the money for a new keyboard? Well, I’m glad you asked, as it will provide me with a post for today.
The irony of writing about writer’s block does not go unnoticed by me, your heroic blogger. I came up with this topic following a desperate bout with this ultimate evil that left me with a fragment of an idea and a near-concussion after applying my forehead to the desk multiple times with increasing force. Now, I wouldn’t suggest such a response to writer’s block if one can help it. If not professionally done, the Head-Desk Method will only result in blunt trauma, a trip to the hospital, and possibly a broken keyboard. So, you may be asking, how do the non-“professionals” deal with this juggernaut if we don’t wish to fork over the money for a new keyboard? Well, I’m glad you asked, as it will provide me with a post for today.
Monday, August 9, 2010
In Defense of Ghost Writing
Justin Bieber is getting a lot of flak for writing his memoirs at 16. Not only is it difficult to buy that a 16-year-old could have enough to say to fill twenty pages, never mind a book, but it’s just as hard—primarily for writers who have been struggling for years to have their own work published—to see “Bieber” and “write” and “book” and “published” in the same sentence. Not because he’s not capable of writing a book—maybe he is, maybe he isn’t—but because we all know what he does, and it’s not writing. He sings. He performs. He does talk shows and guest appearances on “Saturday Night Live.” Who has time to write with that kind of schedule?
“He’ll probably have a ghost writer,” writers who write their own work scoff.
Yes. He probably will.
But that’s because he’s not a writer. He’s a singer. A performer. A teenage kid who blasted into fame when his YouTube video became a sensation. He's also someone with a story to tell.
Now, I’m not here to defend ghost-written fiction, because—a writer, myself—I can’t see that as anything but cheating. Writing fiction is like singing a song—the voice should be that of the artist whose name appears under the title of the work. In fact, it’s safe to say ghost-written fiction is the literary equivalent of Milli Vanilli. (You remember Milli Vanilli, don’t you?)
But ghost-written non-fiction is entirely different, because the focus of the finished product is rarely, if ever, the writing itself (unless it’s very bad). The focus is the subject, whether that subject is a person or a person’s singular experience. The story isn’t being created by someone else who will then take credit for the work—the story already exists. The ghost-writer simply acts as a conduit to deliver that story to the people who want to hear it or who’ll benefit from it.
I’ll admit it. I was one of those scoffing writers when I heard about the impending publication of Justin Bieber’s memoirs. Part of me thought it was ridiculous that a teenager had a memoir to write, and the other was reacting to what I viewed as the unfairness of it all (“I’ve been writing for close to twenty years and I can’t sell a novel, but this 16-year-old singing boy wonder gets a deal with HarperCollins?”). In fact, it wasn’t until I reached the mid-point of this blog post that I started to find myself on Justin Bieber’s side.
He’s 16. Yes. And when most of us remember being sixteen, we think, “What’s he going to write about, his first zit? What it’s like to be grounded? When he got his first bike?” We think those things because that’s all most of us had experienced by 16. But Justin Bieber isn’t like the rest of us. His life has been completely altered by his sudden fame, and most of us can’t begin to imagine how that might affect a teenager’s everyday life. One morning he’s eating Fruity Pebbles in the kitchen before catching the school bus, and the next morning he’s…he’s…well, who knows?
But aren’t you a little bit curious?
Ghost writers bring us the extraordinary experiences of others. There’s a whole lot of life going on that we don’t know about, and even a whole lot more to learn from other people whose powerful or entertaining experiences make fascinating and/or educational reading. Without ghost writers, far too much of the human experience would die with the people who experience it simply because they’re not writers. And, I don’t know, but somehow that just doesn’t seem right.
- Lyla P.
“He’ll probably have a ghost writer,” writers who write their own work scoff.
Yes. He probably will.
But that’s because he’s not a writer. He’s a singer. A performer. A teenage kid who blasted into fame when his YouTube video became a sensation. He's also someone with a story to tell.
Now, I’m not here to defend ghost-written fiction, because—a writer, myself—I can’t see that as anything but cheating. Writing fiction is like singing a song—the voice should be that of the artist whose name appears under the title of the work. In fact, it’s safe to say ghost-written fiction is the literary equivalent of Milli Vanilli. (You remember Milli Vanilli, don’t you?)
But ghost-written non-fiction is entirely different, because the focus of the finished product is rarely, if ever, the writing itself (unless it’s very bad). The focus is the subject, whether that subject is a person or a person’s singular experience. The story isn’t being created by someone else who will then take credit for the work—the story already exists. The ghost-writer simply acts as a conduit to deliver that story to the people who want to hear it or who’ll benefit from it.
I’ll admit it. I was one of those scoffing writers when I heard about the impending publication of Justin Bieber’s memoirs. Part of me thought it was ridiculous that a teenager had a memoir to write, and the other was reacting to what I viewed as the unfairness of it all (“I’ve been writing for close to twenty years and I can’t sell a novel, but this 16-year-old singing boy wonder gets a deal with HarperCollins?”). In fact, it wasn’t until I reached the mid-point of this blog post that I started to find myself on Justin Bieber’s side.
He’s 16. Yes. And when most of us remember being sixteen, we think, “What’s he going to write about, his first zit? What it’s like to be grounded? When he got his first bike?” We think those things because that’s all most of us had experienced by 16. But Justin Bieber isn’t like the rest of us. His life has been completely altered by his sudden fame, and most of us can’t begin to imagine how that might affect a teenager’s everyday life. One morning he’s eating Fruity Pebbles in the kitchen before catching the school bus, and the next morning he’s…he’s…well, who knows?
But aren’t you a little bit curious?
Ghost writers bring us the extraordinary experiences of others. There’s a whole lot of life going on that we don’t know about, and even a whole lot more to learn from other people whose powerful or entertaining experiences make fascinating and/or educational reading. Without ghost writers, far too much of the human experience would die with the people who experience it simply because they’re not writers. And, I don’t know, but somehow that just doesn’t seem right.
- Lyla P.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)